Relative Dissonance

It has long been assumed that there are but two separate forces at work within the world we live in - that which is good and that which is bad. For centuries, experts have argued the concrete definition of these terms. An action that one party considers good might be considered bad by another. Or, perhaps an experience might feel good, but a person might be compelled to rely on the whims of what Sigmund Freud called the Superego, and be overcome with feelings of guilt and remorse for having taken part in said action. That person would call it bad, despite the obviously pleasurable experience they had. On the other side of the sphere, one might take part in an action that benefits the well-being of another, yet is harmful to the action-taker.

This constant tug-of-war had the world's greatest thinkers bickering for centuries. But all that has changed now...

In the late 20th century, a new group of philosophers, known intriguingly as Aiwbbers, came upon the realization that not only is the concept of good an entirely primitive and obsolete idea, but there are actually three different aspects to existance, including bad, known as not okay and slighty green. These three components, unlike good and bad were originally thought to be, are equal parts of the same central idea. This idea (known to many as "reality") is called evil. It is believed to be the center of all that which transpires in the Universe.



This new radical idea, having shattered the illusion which had clouded the world's eyes for so long, brought forth wave after wave of new, revolutionary thinkers. Most of them failed. This is most likely because being new and revolutionary does not necissarily make one intelligent. The most successful ideas of these New Thinkers was that evil was not the central focal point, but rather, it is the Universe itself, and bad and not okay are mere traits of existance. This group also felt that slightly green was a rather foolish idea, and instead brought forth the suggestion that there was a third, unrelated element known as very brownish (named after the late Nichole Brown Simpson, or possibly Charlie Brown...we're not too sure...they sure were an elusive bunch of Thinkers).



And still, one should mention the more fringe-like third group, who felt that.....well, just look at the diagram:

No, we Scientific Types don't quite get it either. But then, this is what you get for giving a Top Scientific Team lots and lots of groovy chemicals to play around with, isn't it?